Re: DOM3

Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> Todd Byrne wrote:
>> Anyone see a reason not to commit the DOM 3 patch
>
> Yup, I do. This patch is not suitable for committing as-is, and looks 
> like some methods need more work.
>
> I'll look into DOM3 issue.
I only gave it a once over just seeing if their was any interest.

>
>
>> and look into rewriting the UglyBrowser to use something else besides 
>> Xerces?
>
> No objections on this one, as long as it does not bring new dependency :)
>
>
I think I know a XSLT transform trick to do it I will test it out and 
see if its a good fit.
>> Any glaring issues with removing Xerces as a dependency?
>
> I don't see any issues in having Xerces dependency, especially since 
> Xerces ships with recent JREs anyway. I also don't see issue with 
> removing Xerces dependency either :)
>
> Vadim
>

Todd