Re: planning release, Re: updating license headers - what's next?

"Todd Byrne" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.xindice.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Shouldn't we go for broke and move to 1.5 ? 1.5 has a bunch of language
features that very nice, and has been out sense 2004-09-29

Todd

On 3/6/07, Vadim Gritsenko <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Georg Sauer-Limbach wrote:
> >
> >>> Speaking of next version... Are there any plans for new release?...
> >> There are also other loose ends - like document caching, meta data
> >> handling, etc - which is good to have fixed before release.
> >
> > There is the problem that changes to the database that are made
> > via the local interface (command line) are not reflected in a
> > running server instance, i.e. in Tomcat. Maybe this makes a
> > candidate for nice-to-fix?
>
> No, this one does not. But bring in other suggestions :)
>
> Regarding your problem. You should never attempt to open database files
> from two
> processes, such as Tomcat & command line tool with -l switch, since that
> will
> corrupt your database. If you are running instance of db in Tomcat, use db
> URL
> in the command line to access this running instance, instead of -l switch
> [1]:
>
>    ./bin/xindice lc -c xmldb:xindice://localhost:8080/db
>
> BTW, have you tried the latest trunk? If you are using windows it should
> prevent
> you from concurrently accessing same database files from different
> processes. It
> does not work for me in OS X though... When Xindice drops minimum java 1.3
> requirement, we could use java 1.4's new file I/O to make file locking
> work on
> all platforms.
>
> Regards,
> Vadim
>
> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/xindice/XindiceFAQ/XindicePort
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.