Re: [VOTE] Minimum Java Version

Todd Byrne wrote:
> Why not 1.5?
> 
> 1.5 feature set is immense.
> 
> Any compiling reason not to move to at least that?

I know I need Java 1.4 features immediately, so I want to make this switch right 
now for Xindice 1.2.

Personally I'd like to avoid jumping to 1.5 without any released Xindice version 
in between, so I would suggest going to Java 1.5 in Xindice 1.3 time frame. 
However, if you ready to do the leg work, and if you have good arguments for 
doing this sooner, you can certainly start discussion about it.

Vadim

> Todd
> On 5/10/07, *Vadim Gritsenko* < [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     All,
> 
>     I propose to set minimum required Java version for Xindice 1.2 and
>     up to Java
>     1.4 because:
> 
>        * 1.3 is already past EOL
>        * 1.3 has no NIO
>        * 1.3 is god slow on OS X :)
> 
>     +1 from me.
> 
>     Vadim