Re: [VOTE] Minimum Java Version
"Todd Byrne" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xindice.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
As far as I know you can set source level to 1.5 and still compile for 1.4JVMs. All of the generics are backwards compatible. I have looked through the build.properties file and I don't think it would me more then a few changes to it and the build.xml. Todd On 5/10/07, Vadim Gritsenko <[email protected]> wrote: > > Todd Byrne wrote: > > Why not 1.5? > > > > 1.5 feature set is immense. > > > > Any compiling reason not to move to at least that? > > I know I need Java 1.4 features immediately, so I want to make this switch > right > now for Xindice 1.2. > > Personally I'd like to avoid jumping to 1.5 without any released Xindice > version > in between, so I would suggest going to Java 1.5 in Xindice 1.3 time > frame. > However, if you ready to do the leg work, and if you have good arguments > for > doing this sooner, you can certainly start discussion about it. > > Vadim > > > Todd > > On 5/10/07, *Vadim Gritsenko* < [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > All, > > > > I propose to set minimum required Java version for Xindice 1.2 and > > up to Java > > 1.4 because: > > > > * 1.3 is already past EOL > > * 1.3 has no NIO > > * 1.3 is god slow on OS X :) > > > > +1 from me. > > > > Vadim > >