Re: [VOTE] Minimum Java Version

"Todd Byrne" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.xindice.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
As far as I know you can set source level to 1.5 and still compile for
1.4JVMs. All of the generics are backwards compatible. I have looked
through
the build.properties file and I don't think it would me more then a few
changes to it and the build.xml.

Todd



On 5/10/07, Vadim Gritsenko <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Todd Byrne wrote:
> > Why not 1.5?
> >
> > 1.5 feature set is immense.
> >
> > Any compiling reason not to move to at least that?
>
> I know I need Java 1.4 features immediately, so I want to make this switch
> right
> now for Xindice 1.2.
>
> Personally I'd like to avoid jumping to 1.5 without any released Xindice
> version
> in between, so I would suggest going to Java 1.5 in Xindice 1.3 time
> frame.
> However, if you ready to do the leg work, and if you have good arguments
> for
> doing this sooner, you can certainly start discussion about it.
>
> Vadim
>
> > Todd
> > On 5/10/07, *Vadim Gritsenko* < [email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >     All,
> >
> >     I propose to set minimum required Java version for Xindice 1.2 and
> >     up to Java
> >     1.4 because:
> >
> >        * 1.3 is already past EOL
> >        * 1.3 has no NIO
> >        * 1.3 is god slow on OS X :)
> >
> >     +1 from me.
> >
> >     Vadim
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.