Re: Extention XPath function

Natalia Shilenkova wrote:
> On 10/22/07, Vadim Gritsenko <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> For XPath queries that use ftcontains function Xindice will attempt to
>>> optimize the query by using LuceneIndexer, if it is available and has
>>> a suitable pattern. If LuceneIndexer exists for the collection being
>>> queried, even if there is no suitable pattern,
>> Does it also log this condition? I'd think at INFO level, say that indexer
>> available but this particular pattern is missing, so that user can check logs
>> and correct the situation.
> 
> This behavior is consistent with queries that may be using other types
> of indexers. If query uses starts-with function and there is no value
> indexer for that pattern, it will not be reported. Is there any reason
> to treat new function differently?

Well I think it depends on how heavy Lucene search is... Ok may be not at INFO, 
but what about DEBUG level? :)

I personally would like to see at least DEBUG message for the situation with 
'starts-with' function, too. And any other like that - were index can speed 
querying up significantly.

Vadim