Re: A question
Hari <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xindice.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Murray / Xoan ,, Murray u have a valid point :) .. , Can Lucene to perform document based search ... Harry Xoan wrote: >Hi Murray, > >Thanks for the info. > >You're right, the only reason to store plain text is to permit searching. > > I think your approach is valid for me. I don't know anything about >Lucene, thereby I have much to read, investigate, ... >Soon I'll come back with more questions ... :) > >Regards, > >Xoan > >2005/4/22, Murray Altheim <[email protected]>: > > > >>Xoan, >> >>All searches happen this way, but that process of indexing goes >>on *before* the user does the search, which is why it seems fast. >>I've integrated Lucene into my Xindice collections, with a >>listener that notes when a document is created, changed or deleted. >>There's an initial cost of indexing the whole collection (if the >>database is populated all at once), but the cost is incremental >>and almost unnoticeable otherwise. >> >>Because Lucene uses a model whereby you feed documents to various >>indexers depending on their type (so a text document goes to a >>different one than an HTML document, which needs a text stripper >>to remove the markup), you don't need a separate text document >>stored for each HTML document, if the only reason you're doing >>that is having the text available for searching. You only create >>the text temporarily for the indexer to function, then dump it. >> >>Murray >> >> > > >