RE: Performance
Namrata Kumari <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xindice.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, the information you shared with us have really been very useful but if u suggest not going for Xindice in case we have large number of records, what are the alternatives? can you suggest something? Regards Namrata _____ From: Eickvonder Bjoern [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 11:42 AM To: [email protected] Subject: AW: Performance Thats really a huge number. You mean you have 20 million xml-files to store? What size does each file have? What kind of request do you expect (give me document this or that or do you have to seach for specific data within all these 20 million records)? I personally think that XIndice will not be suited for your needs. I already had trouble with a few dozens of collections because Xindice opens file descriptors for each of these .tbl and .idx files for concurrent access but never closes them (til shutdown), so I got a too many open files exception on a linux system. Moreover I had problems if multiple users are adding/writing (different) files to a collection concurrently (some data was later on corrupt or missing), so I had to synchronize the write access to each collection. So if all these 500 users will have to write data this will be a problem for you too. Bjoern Eickvonder _____ Von: Sasikanth Tenneti [mailto:[email protected]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Juli 2005 07:55 An: [email protected] Betreff: Performance Dear All I am trying to move one of our product database content into XML xindice DB, the volume I am looking is around 20 million records, is xindice can scale to those many number of records efficiently with about 500 concurrent users requests? Please help me to get some focus on this. Thank you in advance --SasiKanth ____________ Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit Version: AVK 15.0.6273 from 27.07.2005