Re: AW: AW: Performance

The xupdate implementation that Xindice uses isn't thread safe. The
xupdate code uses a global static variable to hold temporary nodes.
Their is also others cases where temporary elements can be left around
but I haven't been able to get the patch commited on the xupdate side.

Todd

Eickvonder Bjoern wrote:
> I use b4 and it does occur if multiple users are manipulating different documents in a collection via xupdates, especially those commands that append elements. In that case sometimes some of the appended elements are missing or a document contains elements that would normally belong to another document. I tracked this issue a little bit and I think it is maybe somewhere in the xupdate implementation, that is used, so it is not entirely an xindice problem.  
> 
> Björn Eickvonder
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Juli 2005 16:33
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: AW: Performance
> 
> Eickvonder Bjoern wrote:
> 
>>Moreover I had problems if multiple users are adding/writing
>>(different) files to a collection concurrently (some data was later on 
>>corrupt or missing), so I had to synchronize the write access to each 
>>collection.
> 
> 
> What xindice version did you use. I've not seen corruptions since b4.
> 
> Vadim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ____________
> Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit
> Version: AVK 15.0.6273 from 27.07.2005