Re: xindice session replication questions

The idea to do replication layer on top makes good sense. My only
issue with it is catching up a host that is not in sync with other
other hosts.

As for the tomcat session replication, I believe the entire context is
replicated, if xindice was stored in memory in the context I believe
it would be replicated.

As to concurrent modification. I plan on writing on a single node. I
do not need transactional replication. I just need a reasonably in
sync copy to be on all the nodes. Lets say I want optimistic
replication and locking. The application is not write intensive.

So right now jgroups + xindici in memory looks good. Thanks.