Re: Strange binding behaviour

Have you tried validating the instance. The easiest way to do so might be to
add a call to xmlDoc.validate(xmloptions) after having set the error
listener.
Can you let us know what the outcome of validation is?
Thanks,
-jacobd
On Jul 13, 2011 6:11 AM, "Henrique" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
> I need to bind a XML doc like this:
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <mapping>
> <em>
> <tag>PEOPLE</tag>
> <tag>INDIVIDUAL</tag>
> <base_ns>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2011/1/Familia.owl#
> </base_ns>
> <local_name>Pessoa</local_name>
> </em>
> <em>
> <tag>PEOPLE</tag>
> <tag>COLLECTIVE</tag>
> <base_ns>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2011/1/Familia.owl#
> </base_ns>
> <local_name>Familia</local_name>
> </em>
> </mapping>
>
> <em> can repeat unbound, the same with <tag>.
> And I have this schema:
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
> elementFormDefault="qualified">
> <xs:element name="mapping">
> <xs:complexType>
> <xs:sequence>
> <xs:element maxOccurs="unbounded" ref="em"/>
> </xs:sequence>
> </xs:complexType>
> </xs:element>
>
> <xs:element name="em">
> <xs:complexType>
> <xs:sequence>
> <xs:element maxOccurs="unbounded" ref="tag"/>
> <xs:element ref="base_ns"/>
> <xs:element ref="local_name"/>
> </xs:sequence>
> </xs:complexType>
> </xs:element>
>
> <xs:element name="tag" type="xs:NCName"/>
> <xs:element name="base_ns" type="xs:anyURI"/>
> <xs:element name="local_name" type="xs:NCName"/>
> </xs:schema>
>
> Now, XMLBeans generates the right Java classes as far as I can see. The
> problem is this:
>
> //assume mapFilePath point to xml file above
> MappingDocument xmlDoc = MappingDocument.Factory.parse(new
> File(mapFilePath));
>
> for(EmDocument.Em em : xmlDoc.getMapping().getEmList()) {
>
> //This always prints: 1
> System.out.println(em.getTagList().size());
>
> }
>
> So, basically, no matter how many <tag> elements I have on the XML,
somehow
> XMLBeans only gets one! But it works fine with <em> elements...
> I've tried to group <tag> inside a <tags> element:
> <tags>
> <tag>PEOPLE</tag>
> <tag>INDIVIDUAL</tag>
> </tags>
>
> with corresponding schema changes, but it strangely displays the exact
same
> behaviour. It only gets one <tag>... As a matter of fact, in this last
case,
> if I do em.getTags() I get null!
>
> If someone could shed some light on this I'd be most grateful!
>
> Cheers,
> Henrique Nunes