optional properties (Re: CVS Update: xmlpull-api-v1/doc)

Stefan Haustein wrote:

> I am a bit concerned about adding lots of property constants
> for optional features.
>
> In my opinion, optional features should not have an additional
> java constant, the unique name is sufficient and does
> not cost memory for implementations not supporting that feature.

hi,

you are right - as they are optional they are not needed in XmlSerializer
but only in documentation (properties.html and features.html).

i have removed unnecessary feature constant from XmlSerializer.

thanks,

alek