Re: SAX or DOM?
Aleksander Slominski <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xmlpull.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Nikhil C. Khedkar" wrote: > --- Aleksander Slominski <[email protected]> > wrote: > > "Nikhil C. Khedkar" wrote: > > > > > Ok, I am using PullParser2_1_8_SMALL.jar, > > > XPP3/MXP1 implementation. What does it use SAX or > > DOM? > > > > that does not use Xerces at all > OK, this may sound elementary, but if this parser > does not require xerces, which one and for what > reason, requires it? there can be different parser implementations and if all are implementing the same API then you can chose implementation that is meeting your needs > What is the advantage in using > xerces/xerces2, if the pullparser small works without > it? there are different tradeoffs involving performance, memory footprint, and required features (like do you need validating parser), see this implementation matrix that lists features of each parser implementing XmlPull API: http://www.xmlpull.org/impls.shtml and choose implementation that is best for you. thanks, alek ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption! http://us.click.yahoo.com/JjlUgA/vN2EAA/kG8FAA/2U_rlB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/