Re: XmlSerialzier
Aleksander Slominski <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xmlpull.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stefan Haustein wrote: > (...) > > therefore we never return 'null' for namespace in XmlPullParser > > but empty string. > > > > so i think that in XmlSerializer we should have similiar approach: > > * prefix and namespace must be always not null for setPrefix() > > * and getPrefix() will return null only when > > The problem are prefixes, not namespaces: In the parser, null is > returned for "no prefix" (see javadoc). ok i see it now: http://www.xmlpull.org/v1/doc/api/org/xmlpull/v1/XmlPullParser.html#getAttributePrefix(int) > In the serializer, null > would be returned from getPrefix for "no prefix defined", and an > empty string would be returned for namespace is default (no > prefix in elements required). This seems a bit inconsistent, but > it would be fine with me... ok i think that it will be also fine as long as we document it well i checked in some clarifications - please take a look . thanks, alek