Re: conformance testing....

Stefan Haustein wrote:

>Hi Alek,
>
>I am not really happy with adding a "<? target" test... and also the 
>additional code for detecting "]]>" in regular text. I would also like 
>very much to remove the code checking for duplicate attributes.
>
>  
>
how big are those chnages to implement?  i think <? is trivial, ]]> 
requires teo extra falgs in text and detecting duplicate attributes is 
very important in case XML has namespaces ...

the problem is with how much correct in regard to XML 1.0 we want to be?

>Cant we define two levels of conformance, where  the basic level only 
>covers tests that make sure that documents respecting the syntax rules 
>are recognized correctly?
>  
>
i guess we can do this. however how to detect what elevel of suport 
parser should have? it becomes complicated ...

>After all, the whole point of kXML is to be as small as possible...
>  
>
yes it is important.

alek

-- 
The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xmlpull-dev/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/