RELAXED CHEKING feature [Re: conformance testing....]

Stefan Haustein wrote:

>>so if http://xmlpull.org/v1/doc/features.html#relaxed is supported those 
>>errors will be not fatal and just reported as violations?
>>    
>>
>
>  
>

>Yes, that would be great.
>
>  
>
hi,

i was thinking about it and would like to add to description of this 
feature it additional clarifications:


"Even when this feature is enabled parser MUST accepts all valid XML 
(the only exception is in case when PROCESS DOCDECL is disabled as in 
this case DOCDECL is not parsed). This feature is intended to indicate 
that the parser will make less effort to detect invalid XML documents. 
This is good to produce small footprint XML parsers for J2ME such as kXML2".

i was also thinking that to indicate intent of this feature (all _valid_ 
XML accepted but invalid may not be detected) we should change name to 
"relaxed-checking"?

thanks,

alek

-- 
The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Upgrade to 128-bit SSL Security!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/qZ0LdD/yjVHAA/TtwFAA/2U_rlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xmlpull-dev/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/