Interest in getting more xmlpull-compliant parsers?

After reading thread about continued development of
xmlpull API, I started wondering if there might be
interest in getting one more xml pull parser to
implement xmlpull? I just released a parser I have
been working on for 2 months (Woodstox) that
implements StAX. Earlier I thought StAX would
completely supercede xmlpull, and there wouldn't be
point in implementing it, but it sounds like that
might not be the case?

I haven't yet gone through xmlpull API, although it
seems reasonably simple, and subset of the most
tangible part of StAX, but in best case there might
not be that much extra work (need to add exception
conversion etc small glue things).

So... what do you think, would it be beneficial to get
one more xmpull-compliant pull parser available?

-+ Tatu +-




	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Domains – Claim yours for only $14.70/year
http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer 


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/2U_rlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xmlpull-dev/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/