Re: ...->sprintf (...)

Tim Waugh <[email protected]> Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:47:17 +0000

Newsgroups	gmane.text.xml.xmlroff.general
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 03:50:49PM +0000, Tony Graham wrote:

> While 'sprintf' is actually not evocative, or descriptive, or easily
> rolling off the tongue, it is well known.  Would gcc complain if it
> was '->sprintf_func'?  Are there any other suggestions for a name?

Actually, changing this:
  ...->sprintf (...)
to this:
  (...->sprintf) (...)

is enough to stop the macro expansion.

Tim.
*/

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCME/lHU/d4jnpWe0RAssxAKCVvCWQWNOPp65g/ZJT/3ZJxAVQhQCeN75d
pTcYoXDf3IVzdIwWdJMGgrU=
=w27s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----