Re: xmlroff-list digest, Vol 1 #146 - 3 msgs

hello

Good news: it works and it works screamingly fast !
112 invoices per minutes on a pentium 1.6 Ghz laptop
which is really great. (compared to 15-20 invoices per
minute with FOP)

1) As expected there seems to be memory leaks.

here's an very small excerpt of what Valgrind is
reporting:
==4489== 160632 (129028 direct, 31604 indirect) bytes
in 8613 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 110
of 116
==4489==    at 0x1B90459D: malloc
(vg_replace_malloc.c:130)
==4489==    by 0x1BFF9A46: g_malloc (gmem.c:137)
==4489==    by 0x1C009A78: g_strdup (gstrfuncs.c:90)
==4489==    by 0x1BD418AE: fo_string_get_value
(fo-string.c:264)
==4489==    by 0x1BC44A33: fo_block_area_new
(fo-block-area.c:315)
==4489==    by 0x1BC4517D: fo_block_area_new2
(fo-block-area.c:496)
==4489==    by 0x1BC491B6: fo_fo_area_new2
(fo-fo.c:1078)
==4489==    by 0x1BC617F4:
fo_block_layout_children_properties_resolve
(fo-block-layout.c:152)
==4489==    by 0x1BC490BD:
fo_fo_children_properties_resolve (fo-fo.c:1029)
==4489==    by 0x1BC48FD4:
fo_fo_children_properties_resolve_default
(fo-fo.c:979)
==4489==    by 0x1BC490BD:
fo_fo_children_properties_resolve (fo-fo.c:1029)
==4489==    by 0x1BD222AA:
fo_table_part_children_properties_resolve
(fo-table-part.c:272)
==4489==
==4489==
==4489== 834570 (620236 direct, 214334 indirect) bytes
in 22483 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 114
of 116
==4489==    at 0x1B904F75: calloc
(vg_replace_malloc.c:175)
==4489==    by 0x1BFF9ACE: g_malloc0 (gmem.c:154)
==4489==    by 0x1BFB8B75: g_type_create_instance
(gtype.c:1576)
==4489==    by 0x1BFA58FE: ??? (gobject.c:1045)
==4489==    by 0x1BFA50CD: g_object_newv
(gobject.c:942)
==4489==    by 0x1BFA574F: g_object_new_valist
(gobject.c:1026)
==4489==    by 0x1BFA4DBA: g_object_new
(gobject.c:823)
==4489==    by 0x1BC247DD:
fo_context_util_spaces_resolve (fo-context-util.c:635)
==4489==    by 0x1BC27581:
fo_fo_resolve_property_attributes_default
(result-to-fo.c:927)
==4489==    by 0x1BC48DF6:
fo_fo_resolve_property_attributes (fo-fo.c:904)
==4489==    by 0x1BC092D9:
fo_node_g_node_traverse_func (fo-node.c:840)
==4489==    by 0x1BFFDC17: ??? (gnode.c:519)
 
2)The  invoices are really bigger than those obtained
with FOP.  63,7 KB compared to  5.6 KB for the same
invoice.

3) Some features seem to be unsupported. No
header/footer and some of the information has vanished
(name and address of the customer for instance). I'll
check on the web site for the unsupported features.
I hope there is a way to solve those problems.

Thank you Stefan and Tony for your help.
Regards
Bruno


	

	
		
__________________________________________________________________
Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace de stockage pour vos mails ! 
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com/


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click