Re: cvs head build failure
Matthew L Daniel <[email protected]> Mon, 1 Aug 2005 00:10:19 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xmlroff.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Please subscribe to the xmlroff-list if you want to continue to discuss > xmlroff. I didn't realize it was moderated until after I sent the message. That is one of many "Fridayisms," as we'll soon see. > > ../fo-context.c:14:29: error: fo-all-property.h: No such file or directory > > In file included from ../fo-context.c:16: > > ../fo-context-private.h:15:25: error: fo-property.h: No such file or directory > > property/fo-all-property.h and property/fo-property.h exist in CVS and should > have been checked out when you checked out the 'xmlroff' workspace. > > Did you somehow not check out the 'property' subdirectory? I make a practice of building CVS projects in an "object directory," and usually automake projects already support this, so I didn't think about it before I posted. A simple `find . -name fo-property.h` would have immediately clarified what I did wrong, but I can only claim brain drain on this one. Sorry for the list noise. To atone for my silliness, here is a patch against Makefile.am that will correct this. Sorry about that, -- /v\atthew
xmlroff-objdir.patch
(text/plain, 618 B)
Index: Makefile.am =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/xmlroff/xmlroff/Makefile.am,v retrieving revision 1.24 diff -u -r1.24 Makefile.am --- Makefile.am 27 Jun 2005 00:13:02 -0000 1.24 +++ Makefile.am 1 Aug 2005 04:04:07 -0000 @@ -8,12 +8,12 @@ $(LIBXSLT_CFLAGS) \ $(GOBJECT_CFLAGS) \ $(POPT_CFLAGS) \ - -Iarea \ - -Iexpr \ - -Ifo \ - -Idatatype \ - -Iproperty \ - -Iutil + -I$(srcdir)/area \ + -I$(srcdir)/expr \ + -I$(srcdir)/fo \ + -I$(srcdir)/datatype \ + -I$(srcdir)/property \ + -I$(srcdir)/util fo_context_cfiles= \ fo-context.c \