Re: What needs to be done to make xmlroff a success?
Tony Graham <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Jan 2006 20:47:53 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xmlroff.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Aron Stansvik <[email protected]> writes: > 2006/1/27, Tony Graham <[email protected]>: > ... >> - Rewrite in a more OO language >> >> - Rewrite in... > > Do you have any specific language in mind? I'm just asking because > your e-mail just popped up as I was reading about the D programming > language* which looks quite interesting. No, I don't have any specific language in mind. I was just fishing for people's thoughts. D does look cool, and I would dearly love native OO and garbage collection, but it wouldn't be a good fit if the intention is for xmlroff to be GNOME-like. It would be fun, but a big diversion, to write spec-dump XSL files to produce D code instead of C code. Regards, Tony. > * http://www.digitalmars.com/d/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642