Re: What changes to FoXmlDoc?
Tony Graham <[email protected]> Sun, 16 Apr 2006 21:47:34 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xmlroff.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stefan Seefeld <[email protected]> writes: > Tony Graham wrote: ... >> The short form of my question is, is it better to: >> - Make separate 'constructors': >> fo_xml_doc_new_from_filename (...) >> fo_xml_doc_new_from_memory (...) > > Yes ! Done. You'll also appreciate, I hope, the changes done to libfo/fo-xslt-transformer.[ch]. Regards, Tony. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642