Re: What's next for xmlroff?

On Tue, Feb 06 2007 19:49:07 +0000, Keith Fahlgren wrote:
> Tony Graham wrote:
...
>> I would then choose to use Trac (http://trac.edgewall.com/) for the
>> new xmlroff website, ticket tracking system, and repository browser.
>> 
>> I have been using Trac for a while now and I quite like it, but what
>> do you people think?
>
> Yeah, I've been happy with Trac in all the places that I've
> eventually got it setup. Occasionally it barfs or gives totally
> stupid errors, and setting it up initially is a real pain, but once
> it's going, it's great (I especially like the RSS feed for commits,
> among other things).
>
> All that said, I don't really think it's a very good Wiki.

If I was looking for just a wiki, I doubt that I'd pick Trac either.

I like Trac because it does wiki, repository, and tickets and supports
easy linking between the three.  With little extra effort, it also
does easy linking to mailing list archives as well.

As for setup problems, that's why I'm looking at the hosted service
instead of doing it myself.  With a hosted service, the security
angles should have been already thought out and upgrades should also
'just happen' instead of my having to find out about them and apply
them.

Regards,


Tony.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642