Xml exclusive c14n

Alex Boese <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.xmlsec
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I was noticing that exclusive canonicalization seems to differ between the lxml and xmlsec implementations. In my observations, if I exclusive c14n an entire xml document utilizing the lxml, namespaces that are unused are completely dropped. With xmlsec, if I do the same, they remain. 

By unused, I'm meaning a namespace with prefix that has no matching prefixed tags in children tags.

Is this deliberate behavior? If so, why the difference?

-Alex
_______________________________________________
xmlsec mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.