Re: ECDSA test key/files

Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> Sat, 4 Mar 2017 10:25:37 -0800

Newsgroups	gmane.text.xml.xmlsec
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Yeah, here it is exactly:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4050#section-3.3

I think the current code is correct.

Aleksey

On 3/4/17 4:46 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> Hi Roumen,
> 
> On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 11:28:59AM +0200, Roumen Petrov <[email protected]> wrote:
>> No this is not correct reference.
>>
>> See rfc4050 "Using the Elliptic Curve Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) for XML
>> Digital Signatures", chapter
>>
>> 3.3.  ECDSA Signatures
> 
> Aha! I wasn't aware of that newer RFC, specific to xmldsig.
> 
>> Does xmlsec follow RFC ?
> 
> Currently it does; my proposed
> <https://github.com/lsh123/xmlsec/pull/90> would change this, but sure,
> looks like that should not be merged after all.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Miklos
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xmlsec mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
>

_______________________________________________
xmlsec mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 842 B)