Re: Thoughts on a new mscng backend
Miklos Vajna <[email protected]> Wed, 9 May 2018 09:22:54 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xmlsec |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============0878799782== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2gsmj2yzd4wkukec" Content-Disposition: inline --2gsmj2yzd4wkukec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Hi, On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 10:06:43AM -0700, Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> wrote: > I wonder if it is better to do it in the tests/ and just add > explanation on how to manually test into the README. But examples > is fine as well (just add a couple sentences to README file there > about it). Aha OK, I'll add the sample template to tests/ with a README in my next pull request. Regards, Miklos --2gsmj2yzd4wkukec Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlryoc0ACgkQe81tAgORUJYiXACeO+33v9IWDIEYoWPTHAb8vlQ0 UIoAn3wbPiiINHucBoFwmoenkGWxcF76 =eEx+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2gsmj2yzd4wkukec-- --===============0878799782== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KeG1sc2VjIG1h aWxpbmcgbGlzdAp4bWxzZWNAYWxla3NleS5jb20KaHR0cDovL3d3dy5hbGVrc2V5LmNvbS9tYWls bWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3htbHNlYwo= --===============0878799782==--