Re: Thoughts on a new mscng backend

Miklos Vajna <[email protected]> Wed, 9 May 2018 09:22:54 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.xmlsec
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--===============0878799782==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2gsmj2yzd4wkukec"
Content-Disposition: inline


--2gsmj2yzd4wkukec
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,

On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 10:06:43AM -0700, Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> wrote:
> I wonder if it is better to do it in the tests/ and just add
> explanation on how to manually test into the README. But examples
> is fine as well (just add a couple sentences to README file there
> about it).

Aha OK, I'll add the sample template to tests/ with a README in my next
pull request.

Regards,

Miklos

--2gsmj2yzd4wkukec
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlryoc0ACgkQe81tAgORUJYiXACeO+33v9IWDIEYoWPTHAb8vlQ0
UIoAn3wbPiiINHucBoFwmoenkGWxcF76
=eEx+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--2gsmj2yzd4wkukec--

--===============0878799782==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KeG1sc2VjIG1h
aWxpbmcgbGlzdAp4bWxzZWNAYWxla3NleS5jb20KaHR0cDovL3d3dy5hbGVrc2V5LmNvbS9tYWls
bWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3htbHNlYwo=

--===============0878799782==--