Re: XPath 1.0 change proposal

--20cf3071ca04002fe304d7e4817e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:34 PM, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> If there was no intent to define the data model without dependencies on
> XML 1.0, then at least half the
> text in section 5 is pointless, unnecessary repetition of things that are
> obvious from the XML spec.
>

Please identify this half.  I just reread section 5, and I'm not seeing it.

All section 5 is doing is saying how to construct an instance of the data
model from an XML/XML Namespaces document. Period.

James

--20cf3071ca04002fe304d7e4817e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:34 PM, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <span dir=3D"ltr">=
&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank">cmsmcq@bl=
ackmesatech.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockq=
uote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc =
solid;padding-left:1ex">

<br></blockquote><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8=
ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">If there was no intent to d=
efine the data model without dependencies on XML 1.0, then at least half th=
e<br>


text in section 5 is pointless, unnecessary repetition of things that are o=
bvious from the XML spec.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Please identi=
fy this half. =A0I just reread section 5, and I&#39;m not seeing it.</div>

<div><br></div><div>All section 5 is doing is saying how to construct an in=
stance of the data model from an XML/XML Namespaces document. Period.</div>=
<div><br></div><div>James</div></div>

--20cf3071ca04002fe304d7e4817e--