Re: xsl-fo first anniversary

Hi all,

Perharps the biggest success is that people start considering xsl-fo as a 
valid replacement solution for LaTeX in production environments :-).

Completly unrelated :

1 - I am feeling that the specification as http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/ should be 
split in two : a definition of XSL as the combination of XSLT and XSL-FO, and 
XSL-FO reference. Currently, I find the confusion between XSL and XSL-FO very 
puzzling.

2 - A small mistake in the spec: in section 7.20.1, the "clip" property uses 
the <shape> datatype. The <shape> datatype is not defined in section 5.11 
"property datatypes".


-- 
Linux produces remarkedly less hot air than Windows: under
Windows, the processor gets hot after just a few minutes.