XSL/XSL-FO Terminology( Was: xsl-fo first anniversary)
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xsl.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In a message dated 18/10/2002 11:18:51 GMT Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: > Completly unrelated : > > 1 - I am feeling that the specification as http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/ should > be > split in two : a definition of XSL as the combination of XSLT and XSL-FO, > and > XSL-FO reference. Currently, I find the confusion between XSL and XSL-FO > very > puzzling. Ed, I suggested similar tidying of nomenclature and so on to the XSL Editors many months ago but the suggestions were turned down ... on fairly flimsy grounds I thought. It is surprising, to me at least, how highly intelligent people can fail to appreciate the difficulties that beginners in a technology experience from such simple issues. I hope that the "XSL" i.e. XSL-FO WG can see a way to introducing more consistency in use of terminology in version 2.0 both at the level of the nomenclature of the technology and in the use of namespace prefixes. Andrew Watt