Re: xsl-fo first anniversary
Dave Pawson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xsl.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 11:16 18/10/2002, Ãric Bischoff wrote: >1 - I am feeling that the specification as http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/ should be >split in two : a definition of XSL as the combination of XSLT and XSL-FO, and >XSL-FO reference. Currently, I find the confusion between XSL and XSL-FO very >puzzling. +1. It does need sorting out. Suggest: Kill XSL as a rec XSLT lives. XPATH lives Affirm XSL-FO. Use XSL as the Working group umbrella. >Linux produces remarkedly less hot air than Windows: under >Windows, the processor gets hot after just a few minutes. Ah, but it never stays on long enough to burn out :-) DaveP.