Re: Reference and First-Class Function

Vladimir Nesterovsky wrote:

  Hi,

> xslt spec suggests to consider extension object as atomic value:

> 18.1.3 External Objects
> An implementation may allow an extension function to return an object
> that does not have any natural representation in the XDM data model,
> either as an atomic value or as a node.

  That's maybe because of my bad English, but I would have said the
text you quoted says instead that "an extension function can return
an object that is neither an atomic type nor a node," which seems to
be exactly what we have here.

  Did I misunderstand something?

  Regards,

-- 
Florent Georges
http://www.fgeorges.org/