Re: Re: [exslt-manage] xmlns:exslt

Uche Ogbuji <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.xslt.extensions
Organization Fourthought, Inc.
Message-ID <1089817733.11655.1501.camel@borgia>
On Fri, 2004-07-09 at 13:15, Daniel Stodden wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 17:42, Daniel Stodden wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 16:36, Uche Ogbuji wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 15:20, Daniel Stodden wrote:
> > > > hi.
> > > > 
> > > > i may be nuts, but could it be that most (all) of the stylesheet modules
> > > > importing js implementations via func:script in the distribution package
> > > > are missing a definition of the exslt namespace?
> > > > 
> > > > e.g.
> > > > 
> > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
> > > > <stylesheet
> > > >   xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
> > > >   xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
> > > >   xmlns:func="http://exslt.org/functions"
> > > >   xmlns:math="http://exslt.org/math"
> > > >   version="1.0"
> > > >   extension-element-prefixes="math"
> > > >   math:doc="http://www.exslt.org/math">
> > > >  
> > > >   <func:script language="exslt:msxsl" implements-prefix="math"
> > > > src="math.exp.msxsl.xsl"/>
> > > >   <func:script language="exslt:javascript" implements-prefix="math"
> > > > src="math.exp.js"/>
> > > >  
> > > > </stylesheet>
> > > > 
> > > > so if exslt:javascript is supposed to be a qname, what URI does it refer
> > > > to? i suppose it's /common.
> > > > 
> > > > is it?
> > > 
> > > I looked through some function defs and I agree this is a significant
> > > problem.  I had not noticed it because I implement EXSLT directly and I
> > > don't use the templates.  All the templates should have the added
> > > namespace declaration, but I hesitate to make it
> > > 
> > > http://exslt.org/common
> > > 
> > > I think that has the effect of adding too much normative force to the
> > > languages used in the sample implementation scripts.  I suggest instead
> > > 
> > > http://exslt.org/non-normative/implementations
> > > 
> > > Thoughts?
> > 
> > it is indeed an interesting problem. 
> 
> hi all.
> 
> i would just like to know whether any final decision has made regarding
> this thread.

I'm hoping for more discussion or feedback before making any changes.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                                    Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net    http://4Suite.org    http://fourthought.com
Perspective on XML: Steady steps spell success with Google - http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=9663
Use XML namespaces with care - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-namcar.html
Managing XML libraries - http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=9160
Commentary on "Objects. Encapsulation. XML?" - http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=9090
A survey of XML standards - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-stand4/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.