Re: EXSLT for XSLT 2.0 - backward compatibility
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xslt.extensions |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Colin Paul Adams <[email protected]> wrote .. > Shouldn't it be possible to implement nearly all of EXSLT for XSLT 2.0 > using xsl:function? (After all, a prominent reason for excluding > functions from XPath 2.0 is if they can be coded with xsl:function.) yes, with little problems... I did an analysis a few mths back but never returned with respect to checking it with the latest XSLT 2.0 spec. > In which case, XSLT 2.0 processors can become backwards-compatible > with EXSLT simply by importing a stylesheet with all the definitions > in (perhaps one stylesheet for the date library, etc. and one for > importing all the libraries). might be a good time, with a few more XSLT 2.0 processors emerging...I think having more then saxon was always the trigger for me to start any new work with EXSLT and XSLT 2.0. --Jim Fuller _______________________________________________ exslt mailing list [email protected] http://www.exslt.org/list