Re: EXSLT.NET licesnsing .....was Re: Re: Using EXSLT functions from Microsoft InfoPath
James Fuller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xslt.extensions |
|---|---|
| Organization | Webcomposite |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dimitre Novatchev wrote: >http://www.tkachenko.com/blog/archives/000547.html > >In particular: > >"Microsoft has licensed the Mvp.Xml project and has rights to use and >distribute our code base." > > thx for the useful link, yes I understand that from Microsoft's position they may use the software...though I still dont understand how this works in conjunction with the BSD license, for general users, esp in light that I cant find the appropriate license.txt files in the source code....though this is probably because I havent searched hard enough. cheers, Jim <offtopic> >P.S. So, I had nothing to do with "being the canonical source" but was >just trying, as usual, to provide correct and useful information. > > yes, point taken, and no point intended to be given.... to be honest I prob ignored this option because of the past 6 days spent trying to recover an office windows XP desktop which thrashed itself senseless (i estimate about 50-75 restarts in one nite) due to damaged PSU....ubuntu installed, old NTFS volume fixed and mounted, Open Office replacement working fine, life easier. Thats not to say I am not interested, I think C# and XLINQ are esp interesting....though I am dog sick of trends in computing and last year I decided that for the rest of my career, I will stick with perl as much as humanly possible, keep current in Java/J2EE esp where it is commercially required of me, and continue to code serious projects and learn the deep inner workings of my favourite LISP (though PROLOG with perl is quite exciting)variant. </offtopic>