Status
"John L. Clark" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xslt.extensions |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20060201233517.GC10347@rejoice> |
In order to take stock of where this project lies and perhaps infuse it
with some new energy, I started an ad-hoc status document[0] that
catalogs some of the outstanding issues that I believe ought to be
addressed by the community in some form.
I think that we should spawn new threads on this list for any of the
individual topics raised in the article. The article currently only
covers substantive issues, but I plan to extend it to procedural issues
in the near future.
One of these topics on which I have intended to start working is the one
involving new attributes for the <xsl:output/> element. It seems,
however, that we only have a process in place for submitting function
and element extensions, but not "other" extensions. Should I just use
the element template, and fill in the details using the <xsl:output/>
element as the root? Are these templates used for formatting and human
review only, or do they feed into some more formal process?
What mechanisms do we have in place for accepting and incorporating
submissions?
I hope that EXSLT can have a vivacious future.
Take care,
John L. Clark
[0] http://infinitesque.net/articles/2006/EXSLT%20Status.xhtml
_______________________________________________
exslt mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.exslt.org/list
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD4UW1jkcskvOyl78RAvJzAKC9mwEiKhmbBeSmGK1pKBu8IZQm0ACcCKnM +9HygNgX5SAcksyRhbJKOU4= =JCRI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----