Re: Status
Frans Englich <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xslt.extensions |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 23:35, John L. Clark wrote: > In order to take stock of where this project lies and perhaps infuse it > with some new energy, I started an ad-hoc status document[0] that > catalogs some of the outstanding issues that I believe ought to be > addressed by the community in some form. > > I think that we should spawn new threads on this list for any of the > individual topics raised in the article. The article currently only > covers substantive issues, but I plan to extend it to procedural issues > in the near future. <quote> I know that several people have also expressed interest in a method="exsl:xhtml". </quote> XSL-T 2.0 has this..? <quote> baseURI and documentURI (January, 2002) These are extremely obvious (at least to me), and I'd like to get them in. EXSLT URI [Encoding] function proposals (August, 2003) </quote> As mentioned in the article as well, XPath 2.0 provides this? Wouldn't it be a great idea to not duplicate what XSL-T 2.0 already provides? The XPath/XSL-T/XQuery specs are well written, strongly specified, and backed up by a good test suite. I see several reasons: 1) Spend energy on stuff not already done; 2) it's difficult and labour intensive to achieve a result of the same quality the XSL/XQuery WGs did; and 3) don't fragment the market and don't compete with XSL-T 2.0, that makes everyone happier. I see the purpose of EXSL-T as to improve interoperability. Instead of that implementors implement their own similar but slightly different extensions, it's done in a standardized way. I think that thinking would be enhanced by filling the holes XSL-T 2.0 has, instead of adding a similar but slightly different layer. Personally, what I would like to see is strong specification of what the extensions does, and a test suite. The XSL-T 2.0 WG is working on a test suite, and perhaps that format can be re-used for specifying a future EXSL-T test suite. On the other hand, perhaps I've gotten brain damaged by reading F&O and the others.. Cheers, Frans