Re: Re: Re: EXSLT 1.0 Proposed List

Dimitre Novatchev wrote:

>Another GREAT specialist in the field is certainly Jeni Tennison -- she 
>played a more important role for EXSLT than anyone else. She is also on the 
>XSLT 2.0 WG.
>  
>
Yes, *MOST DEFINITELY* :D

>So, this shows that there is definitely a group of XSLT users, for whom 
>EXSLT for XSLT 2.0 will be useful, but who do not need and do not intend to 
>use EXSLT for XSLT 1.0.
>  
>
Yep, it does do that.  It seems there's enough folks in both camps to 
justify both implementations.

>We must be well aware of this fact. This was not the situation when the 
>EXSLT (as we know today) was being conceived.
>  
>
Point well taken.

>  
>