Re: No-fail `document` Function Spec
"John L. Clark" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xslt.extensions |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20060313210914.GV7127@rejoice> |
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:17:05PM -0700, Mike Brown wrote:
> I'd say we don't need the additional function if our strongest
> use-case for it is just illustrative examples in the documentation of
> res:document().
Well, besides the fact that I'm a completeness freak, I think it might
enable some interesting runtime introspection of the current stylesheet,
such as user-defined traces and maybe other cool things that people
could invent. Also, it seems like it'd be easy and unobtrusive to spec
out and implement.
Peace,
John L. Clark
_______________________________________________
exslt mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.exslt.org/list
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEFd96jkcskvOyl78RArXZAJ0RzyHKWwzZmA7qHpnFvHYZSJ4qXACgoKaH 0uGHQi+T/pjnupj29okpm9k= =5O4m -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----