Re: set:distinct dropped from Saxon >= 8.2

"Dimitre Novatchev" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.xslt.extensions
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This is a good notice.

We should know that some EXSLT functions are not relevant (and nobody will 
use them) in XSLT 2.0.

Such are most of the functions in the "set" module and, I believe, the 
date-time related functions. Of course, common:nodeset(), too.

It is good to reflect in the EXSLT documentation the existence of XSLT 2.0 
and the fact that when EXSLT was conceived, it didn't target XSLT 2.0 at 
all -- that different XSLT 2.0 vendors may or may not choose to implement 
certain EXSLT modules or may not implement EXSLT at all.

Clearly, we need to produce an entirely new specification for XSLT 2.0. In 
the meantime, while there isn't such specification, to put a notice on the 
EXSLT website advising the users to that effect.

Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev.

"Christoph Lange" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
news:[email protected]...
> Dear exslt maintainers,
>
>  could you please note on the page documenting the set:distinct
> function that it is no longer available in Saxon? It has been dropped
> in version 8.2, for the following reason (from release notes):
>
> The EXSLT function set:distinct() is withdrawn. (It contained a bug
> that was non-trivial to fix, and the functionality is superseded by
> the distinct-values() function and by XSLT's xsl:for-each-group).
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Christoph
>
> --
> Christoph Lange, http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Langec, ICQ# 
> 51191833
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> _______________________________________________
> exslt mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.exslt.org/list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.