Re: XSLT 2.0 extensions? Function memoization.
James Fuller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xslt.extensions |
|---|---|
| Organization | Webcomposite |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Colin Paul Adams wrote: > On this list it has previously been stated that adding extensions for > XSLT 2.0 would be postponed until the long list of 1.0 extensions were > implemented (or something like that). no, though I will give the wheel a crank again...have just setup a new dev server for all this and will move across and announce for next week. > Has this been achieved yet? I would like t re-introduce, in a modified > form, a proposal that Dimitre Novatchev originally requested for > memomizing xsl:functions. > The modification being that the memoization reqest be an extension > instruction actually present within the xsl:function concerned (this > seems to me necessary to preserve compliance with the specifications - > user-defined data elements and extension attributes may not cause a > different final result tree to be produced, and, in some cases, > memoization of a function will do just that). I am interested in such a function as well. --Jim Fuller ----------- FlameDigital Limited | Webcomposite s.r.o. Technical Director Co-Author: WROX Pro PHP4 XML, WROX Pro PHP Web Services Technical Reviewer: WROX Beginning Databases, Beginning XSLT, XML Handbook, Extreme XML 2004,2005,2006 XML Prague 2005/2006 http://www.xmlprague.cz -----------