Re: EXSLT for XSLT 2.0: a new life for EXSLT?

+2 to that, though I will say for myself personally I am unable to
apply any cycles to this effort, I am fully behind it.

cheers, Jim Fuller

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Florent Georges <[email protected]> wrote:
>   Dear EXSLTers,
>
>   On the one hand, EXSLT has been dormant for a while now, and on
> the other hand, there are more and more demands for standardized
> extensions for XSLT 2.0.  So after an interesting discussion on
> XSL List [http://markmail.org/message/saryji2fkhfdrt2w] (started
> on the FXSL forum first,) it became clear that there is a demand
> for something like EXSLT, but for XSLT 2.0.
>
>   So we (Dimitre, Vasu and me) thought to use this mailing list
> to discuss those new extensions, and try to boost a bit the works
> around EXSLT.  To help summarizing the discussions and organizing
> the ideas, I've set a wiki up at http://www.fgeorges.org/exslt2-wiki/
> too.
>
>   Are you ok with this usage of the mailing list?
>
>   Regards,
>
> --
> Florent Georges
> http://www.fgeorges.org/
> _______________________________________________
> exslt mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.exslt.org/list
>