Re: Dynamic vs. Fixed World Views was Re: MARCXML to Topic Maps? MODS to Topic Maps?
Aki Kivelä <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Alex, Patrick, and the rest I really enjoy you discussing on this subject. It is very instructive to read Alex revealing practices of library world and possible pitfalls on MARCXML conversions. Somehow I know the problem field. However, being a practical person, and really wanting the MARCXML to Topic Maps conversion, I would like to throw in an idea. This is mainly to Alex, but broader feedback is always more than welcome. How about converting MARCXML to Topic Maps with a schema similar to MARC to MARCXML conversion. In other words, let's just make topic map a wrapper for MARCXML data, and let's not try to interpret data in fields. Yet another words, let's try to model MARCXML schema somehow with topic maps. I admit the resulting topic map is not very elegant for common people but library people probably find it nice as it mirrors the structure of MARCXML and doesn't mess up their fields. I imagine, it is a nightmare for a librarian if some would mess up with her/his data fields :) Yet another advantage would be an inverse mapping. I suppose it would be possible to convert these topic maps back to MARCXML without loosing information. Alex and all you other library people, would you consider this kind conversion useful? I am happy to explain the conversion idea detailed if I didn't succeed it in the first run - although it isn't that clear to me either, yet. Kind Regards, Aki / Wandora Team