Re: TM/JSON first draft
David Damen <david.damen-tztinFsz/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5869141.8150.1282202391111.JavaMail.root@bizet.spaceapplications.com> |
Hello Robert, I quite like the ideas behind this representation. I have found through experience that for some people the transition from a strict data representation format to a metamodel like Topic Maps can be quite difficult. I would expect that TM/JSON feels more natural to them. This could possibly help a lot in getting Topic Maps more accepted in certain places. I still need to have a closer look at the complete proposal to give more specific comments. Greetz, D. -- David Damen Senior Software Engineer Space Applications Services Leuvensesteenweg, 325 B-1932 Zaventem Belgium Tel.: + 32 2 721 54 84 Fax.: + 32 2 721 54 44 http://www.spaceapplications.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Cerny" <[email protected]> To: "TopicMapMail Mail" <topicmapmail-Zo64W7twoUFWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 4:40:52 PM Subject: [topicmapmail] TM/JSON first draft Hi, Here is my first proposal for TM/JSON which is in the spirit of TM/ XML. The main idea is to have an object representation of a topic map in any programming language that supports JSON without writing or generating mapping code and still being able to access the information with little to no knowledge of Topic Maps. http://www.cerny-online.com/tmjson/ Any feedback is highly appreciated! Please be aware that this is rough first draft to steer the boat in the right direction, so please excuse all the typos. Robert Cerny _______________________________________________ topicmapmail mailing list topicmapmail-Zo64W7twoUFWk0Htik3J/[email protected] http://www.infoloom.com/mailman/listinfo/topicmapmail