TMCL: tmcl:see-also vs. rdfs:seeAlso
Lars Heuer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Semagia |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all,
I am creating RDF to Topic Maps mappings for common RDF vocabularies
and I stumbled over tmcl:see-also [1].
Until today I kept the rdfs:seeAlso [2] as occurrence type but I
wonder if it would make sense to set the occurrence type to
tmcl:see-also. I am tempted to think that this is a bad idea but maybe
others have comments regarding this issue?
RDF:
@prefix wp_en: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/>.
@prefix wp_de: <http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/>.
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
wp_en:John_Lennon rdfs:seeAlso wp_de:JohnLennon .
Possible results:
(a) Keeping rdfs:seeAlso as occ-type:
wp_en:JohnLennon
rdfs:seeAlso: <http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/JohnLennon>.
(b) Translating rdfs:seeAlso to tmcl:see-also
wp_en:JohnLennon
tmcl:see-also: <http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/JohnLennon>.
Ideas? Opinions?
[1] <http://www.isotopicmaps.org/tmcl/2010-03-25/#d0e3899>
[2] <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_seealso>
Best regards,
Lars
--
Semagia
<http://www.semagia.com/>
<http://www.topicmaps.de/mailinglist/> German Topic Maps mailing list
<http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/> Open Source Topic Maps engine
<http://mappa.semagia.com/> Mappa - Python Topic Maps engine