Semantic ambiguity [was: Typing was Re: DBpedia as possible project]
Are Gulbrandsen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi This is getting interesting! :) Alexander Johannesen questioning the basis of linked data and subject identification. Andrew S. Townley's thoughts on scalability, questioning if this can work outside a controlled environment. Steve Pepper on 4. nov: > The categories of human knowledge are better expressed using a prototype model than a criterial-attribute (or "Aristotelian") model. In such a model, roles and types are not sharply differentiated, but rather exist on a continuum. Patrick Durusau on Semantic ambiguity: "Since we are trying to communicate with other people, there isn’t any escape from semantic ambiguity. Ever." We're kind of back to the start. In a messy semi-structured world with information overflow, - what kind of technology can help us find a way? In the meantime, - here's some friday edutainment: "Semantic ambiguity and how human communication fails - except by accident", - revisiting Wiio's laws: http://everythingisasubject.blogspot.com/2010/11/semantic-ambiguity-and-how-human.html Laugh today, - it's a sunny friday afternoon (and sink into depression on monday when you realize that it's not only sarcastic humour) :) Best Regards, Are D. Gulbrandsen The XML-group, Center for Information Technology Services University of Oslo