Re: Subject Indicator Pages for standard PSIs

Benjamin Bock <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.xtm.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Lars,

On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Lars Heuer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
>> you may have noticed that http://psi.topicmaps.org/ now has pages
>> which serve as subject indicators for all standard-defined subject
>> identifiers.
>
> Very cool.
>
> I hope you don't mind a few ideas: Each page should state:
>  * Who published the PSI
>  * Status of the PSI
>  * When it was created (less important).

I added this information to all PSIs. For "created" I chose
"published" and used the date of the latest version available on
isotopicmaps.org. This is not really the creation nor the first
publication nor the first official publication in most cases, but I
found it to be most helpful. If anybody disagrees, I can change the
dates to something more useful or we could distinguish between created
and updated. In this case, somebody needs to find out all these dates
-- and updated would not be entirely correct, either, because the
defining document was updated but not necessarily something related to
this PSI.

>
> An example for a PSI which provides all necessary information:
> <http://psi.semagia.com/iso8601/2010>
>
>
> You created also pages for the glossary terms ... gggrrrrrr ... While
> it might be good to have the PSIs since they are referenced in TMDM we
> shouldn't make them too popular since they are completely useless and
> cause more harm than good.
>
> The bloody glossary terms shouldn't belong to TMDM and we shouldn't
> create pages for them.

No matter how useless they are from a TMDM perspective (I find them to
be valuable from a TMRM perspective), they are in the standard,
therefore there should be pages for them. I added a note saying that
they should only be used to make assertions about the usage of these
terms in the TMDM.

Regarding "unwanted things": I also created
http://psi.topicmaps.org/iso13250/model/name-type with a note that it
is wrong and should not be used and pointed to the correct identifier.

Thanks for the feedback,
Benjamin

>
> Best regards,
> Lars
> --
> Semagia
> <http://www.semagia.com>
>
> <http://www.topicmaps.de/mailinglist/> German Topic Maps mailing list
> <http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/> Open Source Topic Maps engine
> <http://mappa.semagia.com/> Mappa - Python Topic Maps engine
>
>
_______________________________________________
topicmapmail mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.infoloom.com/mailman/listinfo/topicmapmail
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.