Re: Current state of the discussion around RDF+OWL & Topic Maps?
Arnim Bleier <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Andrew, you might also want to have a look into http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.108.7781 http://www.networkedplanet.com/ontopic/2009/11/making_topic_maps_sparql.html http://code.google.com/p/sesametm/wiki/Nikunau What problem exactly are you trying to solve if I might ask? Greetings Arnim On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Andrew S. Townley <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 10 Nov 2010, at 11:45 PM, Lars Heuer wrote: > >> [...] >>> cff into "my X is better than your Y" territory. >> >> CRTM is better than any other RDF -> TM technology you'd find on this >> planet ... :) Truly. ;) > > > ROTFL!!!! :) Thanks for the chuckle, Lars! :) > -- > Andrew S. Townley <[email protected]> > http://atownley.org > _______________________________________________ > topicmapmail mailing list > topicmapmail-Zo64W7twoUFWk0Htik3J/[email protected] > http://www.infoloom.com/mailman/listinfo/topicmapmail > -- Arnim Bleier M.Sc Natural Language Processing Group Department of Computer Science University of Leipzig Johannisgasse 26 | 04103 Leipzig phone: 0049 - 341 - 97 - 32298 fax: 0049 - 341 - 97 - 32299 mail: bleier-jNDFPZUTrfTw9Zu3TmXbXSJk02hg1TJes0AfqQuZ5sE@public.gmane.org http://www.topicmapslab.de/people/Arnim_Bleier ============================================ Maiana - share and explore Topic Map sources http://maiana.topicmapslab.de ============================================