Re: Current state of the discussion around RDF+OWL & Topic Maps?
"Andrew S. Townley" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Arnim, On 11 Nov 2010, at 12:27 AM, Arnim Bleier wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > you might also want to have a look into > > http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.108.7781 > http://www.networkedplanet.com/ontopic/2009/11/making_topic_maps_sparql.html > http://code.google.com/p/sesametm/wiki/Nikunau Thanks for the extra links. I hadn't seen the paper or Nikunau before, but I remember Kal's talk on SPARQL at last year's TMRA conference. Thanks for the link to that as well. > What problem exactly are you trying to solve if I might ask? Basically trying to fill in gaps in my own understanding around the way the assumptions behind each are a) conflicting, b) complementary and c) compatible. The answers to those greatly influence how you structure the mapping beyond any kind of direct constructs and syntax. Thanks for your response. Cheers, ast -- Andrew S. Townley <[email protected]> http://atownley.org