Re: Banging the identity drum again, this time REST-style
Lars Heuer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Semagia |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[...] > I still see some value for RFC 5988 but not for Topic Maps. ... you can always map something to Topic Maps, but Topic Maps is not a first class citizen and it will never be. You can always map something to Topic Maps (regardless of TMDM or TMRM) but Topic Maps isn't a player and I don't think that this fact will change soon. So, we're forced to map something to Topic Maps (TMDM/TMRM) and we shouldn't expect that we'd we popular. Why are CTM/AsTMa= templates popular? Because you can think of triples. You can think of subject has-some-relationship-with object. Users want: subject has-relationship other-subject. That's RDF. Simple, effective. Not necessarily the perfect solution, but a *working* solution. Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> <https://twitter.com/larsheuer/> Twitter <http://www.topicmaps.de/mailinglist/> German Topic Maps mailing list <http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/> Open Source Topic Maps engine <http://mappa.semagia.com/> Mappa - Python Topic Maps engine