Re: Banging the identity drum again, this time REST-style
Are Gulbrandsen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi again Murray Since being a little critical to your remark in my last email, I should hurry to say that the spec that was the main point in your email makes sense. It's a pity it didn't happen. - What happened? Best Regards, Are D. Gulbrandsen The XML-group, Center for Information Technology Services University of Oslo On 24. nov. 2010, at 02.21, Murray Altheim wrote: > Back in 2002 I cowrote a specification* that I believe provided > the necessary functionality, and did so without any major change > to HTML/XHTML, nor did it include non-HTML content in web pages: > > Augmented Metadata in XHTML > Neocortext.Net Working Draft 10 May 2002 > Murray Altheim, Sean Palmer > http://www.altheim.com/specs/meta/NOTE-xhtml-augmeta.html > http://tinyurl.com/augmeta > > ...though I hold out little hope that at this point anyone would > do something so simple. It's a shame HTML 5 doesn't help in this > regard. > > While there is little to no evidence to suggest it, some people > continue to feel that inserting complicated XML markup into web > pages is a more likely bet, so I leave them to that exercise. The > one area that we can continue to productively develop is the > groundwork of PSIs/URLs behind the implementation(s) in markup, > how those PSIs are created, what they mean (i.e., both logically > and epistemologically), how they interrelate, how they can be > surfaced as web services, etc. There's still plenty of room for > interesting and valuable work. > > One of the things missing in a lot of communities is an open > source reference implementation of the primary specifications. > We almost had that with tm4j and perhaps are approaching that > with Ontopia (though that is a commercial product). Building > a reference implementation around the Augmented Metadata spec > (or something similar) would be trivial, indeed, would hardly > be more than an hour's work. The bigger question is: would > anyone use it? What would it take for the network effect to > take hold? > > Murray > > * I would certainly rewrite that 2002 document now, as the prose > has problems, but the basic implementation in markup I still feel > is sound (and simple). > ........................................................................... > Murray Altheim <murray10 at altheim dot com> === = = > http://www.altheim.com/murray/ = = === > SGML Grease Monkey, Banjo Player, Wantanabe Zen Monk = = = = > > Boundless wind and moon - the eye within eyes, > Inexhaustible heaven and earth - the light beyond light, > The willow dark, the flower bright - ten thousand houses, > Knock at any door - there's one who will respond. > -- The Blue Cliff Record > _______________________________________________ > topicmapmail mailing list > topicmapmail-Zo64W7twoUFWk0Htik3J/[email protected] > http://www.infoloom.com/mailman/listinfo/topicmapmail