Re: Using TM to help define the future of XML
Lars Heuer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Semagia |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Patrick,
> I don't suppose you are suggesting that *we* might have some
> responsibility for the failure of topic maps to thrive?
Of course, I do not. My proposal is that we
* should keep self-adulation
* celebrate the next TMAPI Topic Maps engine
* keep talking about TMQL
* drop TMRM from all Topic Maps standards
* claim that we've found the holy grail
* claim that others simply do not understand us because we're
extraordinary
* keep backslapping at conferences
* should wait for a miracle
Not a productive post, but it wasn't meant as a productive post :)
Best regards,
Lars
--
Semagia
<http://www.semagia.com>
<https://twitter.com/larsheuer/> Twitter
<http://www.topicmaps.de/mailinglist/> German Topic Maps mailing list
<http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/> Open Source Topic Maps engine
<http://mappa.semagia.com/> Mappa - Python Topic Maps engine