Re: Using TM to help define the future of XML

Lars Heuer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.xtm.general
Organization Semagia
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Patrick,

> I don't suppose you are suggesting that *we* might have some
> responsibility for the failure of topic maps to thrive? 

Of course, I do not. My proposal is that we

   * should keep self-adulation
   * celebrate the next TMAPI Topic Maps engine
   * keep talking about TMQL
   * drop TMRM from all Topic Maps standards
   * claim that we've found the holy grail
   * claim that others simply do not understand us because we're
     extraordinary
   * keep backslapping at conferences
   * should wait for a miracle

Not a productive post, but it wasn't meant as a productive post :)

Best regards,
Lars
-- 
Semagia 
<http://www.semagia.com>

<https://twitter.com/larsheuer/> Twitter
<http://www.topicmaps.de/mailinglist/> German Topic Maps mailing list
<http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/> Open Source Topic Maps engine
<http://mappa.semagia.com/> Mappa - Python Topic Maps engine
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.